Immedeacy vs. Accuracy

It is not just in blogs that “immedeacy is more important than accuracy” to borrow the words of Nick Denton. The same sometimes goes for traditional online media. Today, the hottest news story in Sweden is whether Italian striker Francesco Totti would get suspended for spitting Danish player Christian Poulsen (Sweden faces Italy tomorrow in Euro 2004). In the race for getting the news out first, Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet jumped the gun and declared that UEFA had decided to suspend Totti. Problem was, they hadn’t.

The article was withdrawn for a short while and a media culpa was published, blaming “technical problems”! “Due to a technical error Aftonbladet previously reported that Totti had been suspended”.

Update: Totti did indeed get suspended, and the media culpa was lifted from aftonbladet.se shortly after.

Lawyer blogs on antitrust lawsuit

Since I work for a law firm I try to stay informed about blawgs, and here is another interesting example. Dan Gillmor writes about the lawsuit “United States of America v. Oracle” which is the antitrust case regarding Oracle’s hostile takeover of PeopleSoft.

Gary Reback, a lawyer for PeopleSoft, is posting daily summaries of the trial on a blog-like format on the PeopleSoft webpage. It is interesting that PeopleSoft use a blog to communicate their side of the story and it shows the importance (at least in the US) of fighting a trial also outside of the court room.

Bulgarian news agency spreads false rumours

The Bulgarian media do what they can to increase the temperature for tonight’s soccer clash bewteen Sweden and Bulgaria in Euro 2004. News agency Novinite even spreads false quotes from the Swedish coach Lars Lagerbäck.

“This is the poorest play in defense that I can imagine, says coach Lars Lagerback.

In his words Bulgarians’ swift attacks are doomed to fail as “nobody know what to do”.

Forwarder, Bayer 04 Leverkusen’s Dimitar Berbatov, was described as “talented, but lazy”.

Lagerbäck denies having said anything close to this.

Smartmobs on journalism

Howard Rheingold publishes a speech he delivered yesterday to the graduating class of Stanford’s Communication Department.

He writes: “I am convinced that the last time young communicators faced this degree of excitement, peril, opportunity, uncertainty, and responsibility was 1776.”

And: “While all these attacks on expression are underway and barriers to communication are being put in place, people around the globe are making entirely new kinds of art and journalism. Young people in every part of the world are using and inventing blogs, wikis, mobile messaging, desktop video, digital music, online animation, social software.”

Reagan might have been behind Soviet submarine running aground in Sweden in 1981

Slightly off topic, but this is too hot to resist. Insightmag.com has some sensational information about the Soviet submarine that went aground in Sweden in 1981. According to this article, the Reagan administration cooperated with Sweden to trap a Soviet submarine on Swedish waters.

Another deft tactical coup in covert activity, also reported here for the first time, occurred when Weinberger visited the Swedish Defense Ministry from Oct. 15-19, 1981, the first visit ever by a U.S. Defense secretary to that country.

Top Swedish defense officials showed Weinberger ministry charts and action reports that gave details of earlier penetration by Soviet and Warsaw Pact submarines into restricted Swedish military areas in violation of international law, according to U.S. intelligence sources close to the case at the time.

Then, on Oct. 27, a Soviet Whiskey-class sub suddenly and very publicly ran aground on the rocks inside a Swedish military base, using a route that had been used previously by another Soviet intruder, these sources said.

Swedish military planners had been increasingly nervous about a Soviet military buildup in the region on the nearby Kola Peninsula. And politically the Swedes were deeply embroiled in the pros and cons of deploying new Pershing II and ground-based cruise missiles in Western Europe, which had been approved by NATO in a 1979 decision, these sources said. Some Swedes thought this a needless provocation and a threat to East-West détente.

According to former U.S. Air Force intelligence sources, it was decided at the Swedish-Weinberger meetings to trap and detain a Soviet submarine, and the office of then-Vice President George H.W. Bush was kept closely apprised of the plan.

These sources also said U.S. technology was able to manipulate the sub’s instruments, causing them to exhibit “false readings” until it was misled and went aground. “We had that sort of technology,” one of the former intelligence officials said.

The result was a huge shock to Sweden, a toughening of its political attitudes, and a huge propaganda victory for the Reagan administration.



Should this be true, this is astonishing new facts about one of the most spectacular news stories in Sweden in the 1980’s. If the Swedish military was involved in trapping the submarine, how come it took 12 hours after it stranded until it got discovered?

UPDATE: Caspar Weinberger made a long interview with Swedish Television in March 2000 about submarines on Swedish waters and the US involvement. Transcript and video found here.