Brand spy crawls blogs for copyright infringements

Some corporations are taking steps to guard their brands and trademarks from copyright infringements online. A Digital Brand Asset Management company called Nameprotectengages in crawling activity in search of a wide range of brand and other intellectual property violations that may be of interest to our clients“.

Word to bloggers, your blog may be crawled by a webcrawler seeking for illegal uses of trademarks, just like Josh’s World was (no, he hadn’t done anything illegal, probably just mentioned a brand name in one of his posts). Now, I guess that blogs aren’t the primary target for these webcrawlers, and Nameprotect says they are honoring robots.txt files so that any site owner can block out crawlers, but I can’t help but wonder what other webcrawler applications the future will have in store, ones that aren’t working by the same ethical standards as Nameprotect.

Bloggers should (apart from follow the law of course) start to learn about how robots crawl their sites and what to do about it. I can’t see why for example owners of copyrighted photos can’t crawl blogs to find illegal uses of their material.

Playstation a no-no in Swedish prisons

In the light of the recent jailbreaks in Sweden, perhaps it is understandable that a certain amount of paranoia has struck the Swedish Prison and Probation Service. Now, no prisoners are allowed to have Sony Playstations in their cells because “they can be manipulated for making wireless communication“.

In the 90s, computer games were allowed in Swedish prisons, but due to the technical development of the games, prison managers fear that they will be used to send SMS and email, with the purpose of planning an escape or to smuggle drugs etc.

I guess prison blogs are out of the question then…?

Hitchhiker’s movie blog is not a blog

The cult book The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy by Douglas Adams is being filmed and the launch of the movie is supported by a blog. I think it is a brilliant idea to use blogs to create a buzz for this movie. The book has cult status and an affectionate fan base, including myself and I guess many bloggers will spread the word about the movie blog even without examining it first. But the blog just doesn’t cut it yet. Why?

  • No comments function
  • No RSS feed
  • No permalinks, although some longer posts have unique URLs
  • Only 7 posts since its launch in May
  • A photo gallery was launched in June with only 2 photos so far

Content is everything, and this blog doesn’t have any. Is it even a blog? I would say no. The site even made my computer crash so I had to write this post twice.

Link via Micro Persuasion.

CIA in PR offensive

In the wake of the events in the USA the last few years, not even the CIA can avoid using PR anymore. The secretive agency has launched a public relations offensive in recent weeks to protect its turf.

“… reporters are more frequently invited to CIA headquarters, in Langley, Va., a short drive from Washington, for news conferences and background interviews with senior agency officials…”

No Pepsi allowed at the Olympics

Someone in Greece has been out in the sun too long, because this is simply too dumb. Spectators at the upcoming Olympics in Athens run the risk of being barred from the games if they bring products with the wrong brand into the arena. The “clean venue policy” has been dreamed up by the Greeks and the IOC to protect sponsors from ambush marketing.

“Sweltering sports fans who seek refuge from the soaring temperatures with a soft drink other than one made by Coca-Cola will be told to leave the banned refreshment at the gates or be shut out.”



“Fans will be allowed into the Olympic complex if they are drinking Avra, a Greek mineral water owned by Coca-Cola, which paid $60 million US for the privilege of being one of the main sponsors. Officials are under orders not to let in rival brands’ bottles unless the labels are removed.”



How are consumers/audience supposed to react to this? They are going to be out in the sun, 40º, all day to watch the event of their life time and think it would be somewhat intelligent to bring a can of Pepsi or whatever. But when entering the stadium they are told to throw it away, because Coke says so. I’m sorry, but my soft drink preferences would start to lean slightly away from the word’s #1 brand. This is just not good PR.

Among all the silly ideas, I think this one is my “favourite”:

Staff will also be on the lookout for T-shirts, hats and bags displaying the unwelcome logos of non-sponsors. Stewards have been trained to detect people who may be wearing merchandise from the sponsors’ rivals in the hope of catching the eyes of television audiences. Those arousing suspicion will be required to wear their T-shirts inside out.

I absolutely sympathize with the IOC wanting to protect sponsors who pay proposterous amounts for the exclusive rights to show their brands, and ambush marketing is a method which raises ethical questions.

“Ambush marketing is not clever marketing — it is cheating. And who wants to be a cheat?”

Michael Payne, IOC Marketing Director

Sponsors make an event like the Olympics possible. Piggybacking of non-sponsoring companies can be, but doesn’t have to be, unethical. But to let sponsors decide what the spectators can eat, drink and wear is a few steps too far.

Footnotes:

The Greeks have used “clean venue policites” previously, for example at the Athens 2003 Regatta (pdf).

“Today the Olympic Games is the only major event in the world to hold such a policy” (
pdf).

IOC rule 61 and the enforcement of “clean venue policy” (pdf)

Link via Adrants.